Benchmark Solicitors LLP

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

0203 405 4540

info@benchmark-solicitors.co.uk

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Team
    • Paul Rogers
    • Ross Paterson
    • Louise Delgado
  • Practice Areas
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Property Repossession
    • Property Disputes and Property Investments
    • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
    • Landlord and Tenant
    • Probate Disputes
    • Agency Advocacy
    • Document Filing (Same Day)
  • Fixed Fee Work
  • News
  • Testimonials
  • Links
  • Areas Covered
  • Contact

Fair Redundancy Procedures and Selection

June 19, 2012 By Benchmark

In a redundancy situation, an employer that has decided that there is a redundancy situation must then decide who may potentially be made redundant.  Those roles which are selected are generally referred to as the redundancy pool.

The question of who ought to go into the pool is a key part of any redundancy process; however, a pool of only a single person will often be viewed with suspicion.

Why?

It is not said often enough that the redundancy must follow both a primarily objective and secondarily subjective test – scored on objectively justifiable criteria. 

What Does This Mean?

In reality this means that the focus in the first instance in any redundancy must be the role not the person performing it. As such it is easy to see why a pool of one would on the face of it appear suspicious.

However there are times when a pool of one is reasonable. In the case of Halpin v Sandpiper Books Ltd 2012 AER59 the company only had a single employee working in China, who had previously carried out some administrative tasks.  These functions had been taken over by people in the UK. It was decided to shut the company’s arm in China down.

The only employee was informed of the risk of redundancy. Unsurprisingly, he was dismissed on the basis of redundancy.

Why was this case different?

The sole employee in this case was dismissed not because of a subjective criteria rather it was because of the objectively justifiable test of not needing the work which he was doing in the place where he was located. Contrast this with for example the redundancy of a manager in London who was made redundant only to be replaced by a new staff member working in London in the same place purely on the basis that he had not worked with his line manager before. One position is clearly biased and unfair the other is not.

Challenges to selection generally succeed where subjective criteria are applied to a particular employee.  They will not succeed where a single employee is made redundant for an objective reason such as in the present case.   

Benchmark Solicitors can assist you in preparing and conducting your redundancy procedures, and ensuring that selection criteria are appropriate. 

Chris Tuckett, Solicitor – 19 June 2012

 

Filed Under: Employment

Areas of Interest

  • Bankruptcy
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment
  • Immigration
  • Landlord & Tenant
  • News
  • Property Disputes

Property Solicitors Central London

Benchmark Solicitors LLP is a Central London based law firm specialising exclusively in land and property related disputes.  Our team of experienced property dispute lawyers are based in Temple just moments from the Royal Courts of Justice.

Our Expertise

Our solicitors only specialise in civil dispute resolution (commonly referred to as litigation). Our team have particular expertise in claims involving property repossessions and tenant evictions, landlord and tenant disputes, bankruptcy and the family home and investment property (including foreign property investments).  Given our proximity to the Royal Courts of Justice and Central London County Court we are able to offer competitive rates for agency advocacy services.

Recent News

  • Japanese Knotweed – Article on Davies -v- Bridgend County Borough Council
  • Brooke Homes (Bicester) Limited –v- Portfolio Property Partners Limited and Others [2021] – All Reasonable Endeavours in Property Contracts
  • London Trocadero (2015) LLP v Picturehouse Cinemas Limited – Commercial Rent Arrears
  • Article on Sequent Nominees Limited v Hautford Limited

Our Advantages

Highly specialised legal services: property litigation and insolvency/bankruptcy litigation.

Close knit team: clients get combined experience.

Location: Temple, near leading courts.

Fixed Fee Initial Meeting

We offer a fixed fee no obligation sixty minute meeting for us to provide you with initial advice and direction. Contact us via the contact form, email address or telephone for more information as to how we can help you begin to resolve your dispute today.

Keeping in Touch

Post: The Gate House, Cliffords Inn Passage, Clifford’s Inn, London EC4A 1BL

Tel: 0203 405 4540

Email: info@benchmark-solicitors.co.uk

Why not keep up to date with the current law via our Twitter, Linkedin and Facebook pages.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Check us out

Copyright © 2025 Benchmark Solicitors LLP Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority registered number 567492 Benchmark Solicitors LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership incorporated in England and Wales under registered number OC 372424